Production
Parts, cycles, progress and forecasts by shift.
We design systems that turn data from machines, operators and processes into useful information during the shift. Production, quality, maintenance and leadership can work from the same operation, with current data and rules adapted to the plant.
Interactive demo · sample data
We can read cycles from the PLC, combine them with operator input and turn them into progress, forecasts, downtime causes and alerts during the shift.
Production is one part of the flow. We can connect orders, materials, quality, maintenance, tooling, model changes and reporting so each area enters data once and it keeps moving.
Parts, cycles, progress and forecasts by shift.
Inspections, causes, evidence and releases.
Duration, reason, recurrence and owners.
Preventive tasks, faults, spare parts and availability.
Lots, consumption, waste and links to orders.
Use, changes, life and process conditions.
Priority, product, quantity and due date.
Machine, shift, operator, lot and inspections.
Results, events, causes and pending items.
Relevant conditions during operations.
Recurring downtime, cycles above standard, scrap and long changeovers consume installed capacity. Measuring them by machine, shift, product and cause helps the team prioritize where to act.
Adjust the assumptions and compare current productive value with a selected improvement.
Illustrative scenario. Actual value depends on process, mix, demand and the plant's capacity cost.
We can connect order, machine, shift, operator, parameters, inspections, scrap and material lot. When a deviation appears, the team can trace what happened and which production was related.
We can record faults, preventive maintenance, spare parts and downtime, then connect them with actual production data to identify recurring issues and critical equipment.
159 accumulated min · recurring pattern on shift 2
PLCs, digital signals, OPC UA, Modbus, EtherNet/IP, databases, ERP and tablet input can coexist in a project. We first review equipment, network and protocols, then define the appropriate architecture.
The final connection depends on the available controller, protocol, network, licenses and technical access.
We could begin with the machines that most affect capacity, validate cycle readings and downtime causes, then extend the system into quality, maintenance and materials. Scope and schedule are defined with the plant.
Illustrative roadmap · sequence is defined with the plantScope is built around operations, data and the available technical conditions.
The available interface decides it. We review PLCs, protocols and signals before defining the connection. For equipment without a useful interface, we can evaluate reading alternatives that leave machine control intact.
We can work with lines, presses, lathes, assembly and other processes where a signal, controller or operating input can represent the cycle.
Cost is set by the number of machines, data sources, integrations and processes. The first step is a review at no cost: we reply within one business day and, after the review, send you scope, timeline and cost in writing. The proposal compares that cost with the losses we can measure in the operation.
Yes. We design the architecture to add processes, equipment and areas in stages while maintaining a consistent source of information.
We can review machines, processes and shift decisions to define a first scope that delivers useful information to production and related areas.
First review at no cost · Written scope and integrations