Custom manufacturing software

Custom software that connects production and operations

We design systems that turn data from machines, operators and processes into useful information during the shift. Production, quality, maintenance and leadership can work from the same operation, with current data and rules adapted to the plant.

Production floor · Plant 01Sample data
Plant · injection floor
PLC · Modbus TCP · --:--
Shift target: 4,500 · 0 At this pace the shift closes at 0−4,500 parts under target
Press · OEE 0%Shift stoppages
  • Hydraulic failure0 min
  • Material shortage0 min
  • Mold change0 min
  • Process adjustment0 min

Interactive demo · sample data

Live production

What happens on the floor reaches the people who can act

We can read cycles from the PLC, combine them with operator input and turn them into progress, forecasts, downtime causes and alerts during the shift.

  1. 01Automatic reading when a suitable interface is available
  2. 02Brief input for causes and exceptions
  3. 03Forecast that changes with the actual pace
Beyond OEE

The system can grow around the operation

Production is one part of the flow. We can connect orders, materials, quality, maintenance, tooling, model changes and reporting so each area enters data once and it keeps moving.

OP / 01

Production

Parts, cycles, progress and forecasts by shift.

OP / 02

Quality and scrap

Inspections, causes, evidence and releases.

OP / 03

Downtime

Duration, reason, recurrence and owners.

OP / 04

Maintenance

Preventive tasks, faults, spare parts and availability.

OP / 05

Materials

Lots, consumption, waste and links to orders.

OP / 06

Molds and tooling

Use, changes, life and process conditions.

OP / 07

Orders

Priority, product, quantity and due date.

OP / 08

Traceability

Machine, shift, operator, lot and inspections.

OP / 09

Shift reporting

Results, events, causes and pending items.

OP / 10

Alerts

Relevant conditions during operations.

Economic impact

Existing capacity can also be used more effectively

Recurring downtime, cycles above standard, scrap and long changeovers consume installed capacity. Measuring them by machine, shift, product and cause helps the team prioritize where to act.

SIM / MANUFACTURA

OEE recovery scenario

Adjust the assumptions and compare current productive value with a selected improvement.

Current OEE68.9%
Current productive value$1,388,028
Additional monthly scenario$60,480
Annual scenario$725,760

Illustrative scenario. Actual value depends on process, mix, demand and the plant's capacity cost.

Quality and traceability

Every lot can retain its history

We can connect order, machine, shift, operator, parameters, inspections, scrap and material lot. When a deviation appears, the team can trace what happened and which production was related.

Traceability · OT-4821 · Example0/6
  1. 01
    OrderOT-4821
  2. 02
    MaterialPP-H40 · L-0918
  3. 03
    MachineInjection press 03
  4. 04
    ShiftShift 2 · Laura M.
  5. 05
    InspectionDimension and appearance
  6. 06
    Result98.2% good parts
Maintenance connected to production

Machine history helps decisions before the next downtime event

We can record faults, preventive maintenance, spare parts and downtime, then connect them with actual production data to identify recurring issues and critical equipment.

Injection press 03 · Sample historyPreventive service due in 20 h
EventDateDowntime
High temperatureSep 246 min
Hydraulic leakAug 1882 min
Mold sensorAug 431 min

159 accumulated min · recurring pattern on shift 2

Shop-floor integrations

We review how every machine and system communicates

PLCs, digital signals, OPC UA, Modbus, EtherNet/IP, databases, ERP and tablet input can coexist in a project. We first review equipment, network and protocols, then define the appropriate architecture.

IN / 01PLC / machineIN / 02Digital signalsIN / 03Operator input
CORE / FLOWGateway / edge
OUT / 01PlatformOUT / 02Tablet and dashboardOUT / 03ERP and reports

The final connection depends on the available controller, protocol, network, licenses and technical access.

Project example

Example: 14 machines and three shifts

We could begin with the machines that most affect capacity, validate cycle readings and downtime causes, then extend the system into quality, maintenance and materials. Scope and schedule are defined with the plant.

Illustrative roadmap · sequence is defined with the plant
  1. 01Discovery
  2. 02Pilot · 4 machines
  3. 03Validation
  4. 04Expansion
  5. 05New areas
Questions before getting started

What to define in the first review

Scope is built around operations, data and the available technical conditions.

Q/01

Do you need to modify my machines?

The available interface decides it. We review PLCs, protocols and signals before defining the connection. For equipment without a useful interface, we can evaluate reading alternatives that leave machine control intact.

Q/02

Is it only for injection molding machines?

We can work with lines, presses, lathes, assembly and other processes where a signal, controller or operating input can represent the cycle.

Q/03

How much does it cost?

Cost is set by the number of machines, data sources, integrations and processes. The first step is a review at no cost: we reply within one business day and, after the review, send you scope, timeline and cost in writing. The proposal compares that cost with the losses we can measure in the operation.

Q/04

Can it grow into quality and maintenance?

Yes. We design the architecture to add processes, equipment and areas in stages while maintaining a consistent source of information.

Another question? Write to us

Let's review where to connect your plant first

We can review machines, processes and shift decisions to define a first scope that delivers useful information to production and related areas.

First review at no cost · Written scope and integrations